Dr. Gilbert Doctorow Reveals: Russia Unleashes Relentless ATTACK Waves! F-16s CAN'T HELP

Dr. Gilbert Doctorow is an independent political analyst based in Brussels. 

He holds a doctorate in Russian history from Columbia University and graduated magna cum laude from Harvard College1. 

His analytical articles on international affairs are regularly published on the portal of the Belgian daily La Libre Belgique, and he has contributed Op-Ed articles on US-Russian relations to the English-language Moscow Times2. 

If you’re interested in hearing more from him, you can also find discussions on Russia’s geopolitical strategies and predictions about Putin’s next moves in interviews with Judge Andrew Napolitano3. 🌐📚

Learn more

1substack.com2thenation.com3youtube.com4tribune-diplomatique-internationale.com

Transcript

0:00

let's start with the Navy Day Parade in St Petersburg you want to share

0:06

something with us from time to time from year to year I attended this uh this

0:12

Navy Day Parade which was really just a parade of ships as they say um going

0:18

back to the the 19 early 1990s or maybe even the late

0:24

1980s uh I'm married to a Russian and her father was a re

0:30

Admiral um not a maner ship but um teaching at at various uh Navy

0:39

institutes uh lecturing and so he would go every year to that Navy parade he got privileged access to the to

0:47

the to the banks of Neva and when we were in in Petersburg every every few

0:54

years we would join him and uh and then of course in in this millenni

1:00

I've gone uh on my own to whenever I was in Petersburg in in in July however what

1:08

happened this past Sunday was to my knowledge um quite novel uh there were

1:14

never in the past participation of foreign vessels in this Naval

1:20

parade uh this time we you had uh definitely a uh two Chinese ships and I

1:27

understand one one Indian ship perhaps something from Algeria though it's not entirely clear the there were always uh

1:36

foreign delegations but of a very specific kind they were in the past the naval

1:42

ades uh in the embassies of uh all accredited countries in in in in in

1:49

Russia so they would send one or two officers uh or or just general purpose

1:56

diplomats who were not necessarily at all expert in questions of of Naval

2:03

matters and what happened this year was not just the participation of the several vessels but a very large

2:09

delegation um primarily from brics countries but not only who came from the

2:16

country of origin that is to say they flew in precisely to participate in this event that never happened before to my

2:23

knowledge and it it had an a very clear purpose that was to demonstrate

2:30

the uh the fact that these countries are on the side of Russia in the present

2:36

confrontation with uh with the collective West the Indian presence was of course

2:41

most remarkable um because Modi has been always careful treading a a narrow path

2:49

between east and west and that he uh demonstrated his solidarity with Russia

2:54

in a military um uh activity

3:00

uh is worthy of mention of course the other item which was picked up by by

3:07

Major media in the west was the speech that Vladimir Putin made uh which um was

3:14

very important U and he was setting out Russia's response to the latest

3:21

provocation coming out of Washington with the acquiescence of Germany namely

3:26

the announcement that the United States would be um sending to Germany in

3:32

2026 its um uh medium to long range um

3:40

cruise missiles uh with nuclear carrying

3:45

capability uh this is a this as Vladimir Putin said in his speech takes us back

3:51

to the to the cold war in the 1980s when uh the United States in

3:57

response to to Russian medium- range missiles mostly ss-20's sent dispatched pings also these

4:06

are these are cruise missiles capable of hitting hitting uh Moscow and other

4:13

Russian cities there was enormous demonstration in Germany uh popular

4:20

demonstrations against this development against um turning Germany into a

4:27

potential Battlefield between United States and Russia um because of the

4:32

basing of these of these missiles so threatening to Russia on German soil the

4:39

latest announcement which seems to have been given uh by the United States telling telling schel what to do without

4:47

even naming where the towns in Germany where the the missiles would be

4:53

installed uh this has so far um evokes no response no

5:00

critical response in Germany and Putin used the opportunity of this very

5:06

important Naval Day Parade to make a speech of considerable importance

5:12

firstly that Russia would be responding in a in a mirror image way

5:18

to um to anything the United States does uh that explaining that Russia has um is

5:26

prepared to forego its moratorium on on installation of missiles of this

5:34

kind in the case of Russia he's speaking about medium range missiles which would be capable of destroying virtually every

5:42

city or every military installation all across Europe what are we talking about that

5:48

was not in the speech but it was on talk shows which followed the speech in which

5:53

Russian experts were explaining that what is an issue here is the expansion

5:58

of the kin all uh to to to a much greater range it has I think uh it will

6:05

have a 1500 km range that will be that will be extended um and so that

6:10

virtually all of Europe is covered by kinal the

6:16

um there is also noted on the talk shows that the American decision to to place

6:24

um uh these these um long range missiles

6:30

capable of hitting Rich the whole of of of Russia uh in Germany now was

6:35

justified um in the remark that Russia has missiles in

6:41

kaliningrad capable of of reaching us bases and other and other military

6:47

Assets in Europe however as the same talk shows reminded us those assets

6:55

Russian assets have been there for five years and no one said a word about them

7:01

uh so the decision to um to now in 2026 install these missiles from the United

7:08

States is really an escalation in the word in the war of words and potentially

7:15

in military confrontation uh and between Russia and

7:20

and the United States initiated by the United States and taking place on the territory of Europe uh and of Germany in

7:28

particular so the for these various reasons the speech at Naval day uh in St Petersburg

7:37

had considerable importance only part of which has been picked up by the Western press yeah in your opinion when it comes

7:46

to Europe and their policy right now do you do you understand why they're trying

7:52

to convince zinsky to continue the conflict in Ukraine because if it seems that zinski tried to talk with Trump to

7:59

and and Trump was warning him that the conflict the continuation of the conflict is not working for Ukraine nor

8:07

for the United States and right now it seems that Europeans are totally in favor of the continuation of

8:14

the conflict can we understand what's in their mind well in that in that telephone

8:21

conversation between ziny and Trump to which you're alluding we only know what one side said or what one side says that

8:28

he said that is Trump's going to the press and saying he told that he reminded uh zalinski that Russia is a is

8:36

a war machine that and that Russia has has had has a a history of Valor and of

8:44

successful military missions uh unequaled by any other

8:49

country and he took it back to to Napoleon and and of course were World War II that's what Trump says that he

8:57

said we don't know what zilinski said it may be as you just suggested that

9:03

zilinski um wanted to use this opportunity to establish a tie with with

9:08

with Trump and show that he was that he was considering actively Trump's um

9:16

offer toh to be a broker in in negotiated settlement of a war but it

9:23

can also be that selinski remains delusional uh in every way

9:30

and was trying to persuade um Trump to have to rethink his decision to stop

9:37

funding the war and to instead to come to Ukraine's Aid should he be elected so

9:45

we don't know what they what he said but um it is simply interesting that he made the effort to reach out to Donald Trump

9:53

uh and I think that's explained by the fact that it that kamala's rise in po po

9:59

it and and funding that she's gotten in this start of this honeymoon month um

10:06

after being after walking in the nomination for for the

10:13

Democratic presidential candidate um in this period uh hadn't yet um become

10:22

apparent and um Trump's um high ratings

10:28

and high uh likelihood of of election in November was still um hanging in the air

10:35

so zinsky was trying to reinsure himself of that he has some sort of tie with

10:41

with Trump um in in the in the possibility if not eventuality that

10:47

Trump will win the elections do we know what's the opinion on the part of Russians on Camala Harris

10:55

and the way that she's talking about the conflict in Ukraine uh just watch Megan Kelly and you've got

11:02

their take on Kam Harris uh the Russians uh on their talk shows they have St

11:08

they've taken the gloves off and they're saying what they really think about these monstrous people who who are

11:15

considered to be the leaders in in the west and particularly in United States

11:20

um they on the Sol of Y show the host was explaining to the audience that um

11:27

Harris began her career on her lying on her back that uh and this this I said was

11:34

was given in some detail in in on Megan Kelly's program making reference to her

11:41

um position as a lover of the black mayor well at the time he was the head

11:47

of the um the assembly and he went on to become the mayor of San Francisco and he

11:55

uh in this love relationship um with har uh introduced her to the big donors and

12:02

all the movers and shakers in in California politics which gave her a leg

12:08

up which gave her a big Advantage uh as she proceeded to make a career uh in in

12:17

California and become the the district attorney and um and attorney general so

12:24

that aspect um reminding us that from the very beginning Cela Harris made her

12:31

made her um Her Moves um on the most um

12:36

most vulgar manner uh and not on the basis of Merit not because she was an

12:41

outstanding law student or or any other the the um trappings of

12:49

success uh that have been earned by Merit and talent which the Democratic

12:54

party is trying to uh to um uh put at at

12:59

her feet today can we say the last objective of Russian army right now in Ukraine is the

13:08

nazification and demilitarization of the Ukrainian Army and and how Russia can achieve that is

13:16

that going to be militarily or politically or a combination of both I think it's a combination of both

13:24

but the military is the dominant side but we're witnessing now and even in the

13:30

financial times even in the New York Times there are articles day after day

13:36

explaining that the Russian army is progressing advancing and is taking

13:41

advantage of weaknesses in the in the Thousand or 800 kilometer uh line of

13:49

Confrontation and there are weaknesses of course as and we know why um it's not a generalized issue of of lack of

13:57

Manpower though that is that is significant it is a fact that the that

14:02

the Russians have drawn to the kov region the best uh brigades the best

14:09

trained and the best equipped units of the of the Ukrainian Army and there are

14:15

necessarily weak spots in that vast line of Confrontation which the Russians are

14:21

exp are exploiting the our newspapers go on to say that the Russians are are um

14:27

are throwing waves of of troops against the ukrainians with the suggestion the

14:34

Russians are experiencing um heavy losses well I watched the the Russian

14:40

Daily News uh and I see the interviews with their um with their soldiers in the

14:47

field uh from the past I can say that those interviews seemed to be quite

14:53

legitimate to be quite open and honest because the the the um

14:59

interviewees were saying things that showed the stress and strain that they

15:05

were experiencing um and um uh and what I see

15:10

now is a lot of confidence uh and high professionalism

15:17

and yes they are they are destroying the Ukrainian Army uh and they're doing it uh in a way

15:24

that logically means that the Russians are suffering very small losses

15:29

they are using their their three-ton bombs they are using their Heavy

15:35

Artillery they are using their drones and first they are demolishing what

15:41

fortifications the ukrainians have in the various settlements that are that are under attack and only when they have

15:50

massively um destroyed what could have protected the Ukrainian soldiers do they

15:56

send their shock troops in to finish the job so I would um given all of the the

16:05

equipment um and the skills that the Russians have acquired over the last two years um and particularly in in

16:12

electronic warfare with the the Russians um had had zero um preparation in drones

16:19

and this war has become not only a war of artillery but a war of drones the

16:25

Russians are now catching Ukrainian

16:30

drones putting uh which are EC connaissance drones putting bombs on them and sending them back

16:36

home which considering the ident the identification of these drones they would go back where they came from so

16:43

the this is a war unlike any other and I can say that the Russians are not

16:49

resting on their Laurels they know very well that the present War uh is new and

16:56

that they have adapted and learned skills which they never had before and they're manufacturing or adopt or

17:03

modifying existing weapons to suit the battlefield as it is today but at the

17:09

same time in light of the announcements made made by the United States about its

17:15

intention of putting new weapon systems and I I I I admitted one fact I spoke

17:22

about the the um the cruise missiles the tomahawks uh but the announcement also

17:28

stated that the United States will be shipping to Germany uh Hypersonic missiles which the the states

17:35

practically speaking today don't have so what the Russians are saying to themselves is that their advantage the

17:42

window of opportunity they exploited in February 2022 when they were without any question

17:50

years ahead of the United States and of any West European country in

17:55

developing uh F fifth generation fighter gen in developing um the Hypersonic

18:02

missiles um that is is is diminishing with time and they are actively pursuing

18:10

the creation of yet a new wave of advanced um uh armor and and other

18:18

military equipment uh for the next confrontation they expect to have with

18:24

the United States in Europe and elsewhere Victor Oran just recently said

18:29

Russia is different from how we were made to see it and in your opinion is

18:36

the image of Russia is changing in the mind of Europeans or is just happening

18:41

in the mind of Orban and fitel well I think the most important thing is the image of Russia is changing

18:48

in the minds of Russians uh I have been invited to to

18:53

contribute a chapter in in a book uh that will be published in England uh chapter

18:59

devoted to um to Russian's self-perception and how uh in the case

19:06

of Russia uh Wars make nations in the west it has come up and articles have been written about how the war how the

19:12

war is creating a Ukrainian Nation well but not a word has been said about how the war is creating a Russian nation in

19:20

a way that didn't exist before so that is the most important thing how Russians think of themselves and they do now have

19:28

a level of patriotism and a level of commitment and a level of self-confidence that um did not exist

19:35

before in the past you had um I can call them fifth column but let's be more charitable and simply say Skeptics and

19:43

doubters of Russia's ability based on 3% of the world's uh GMP to um uh to be a

19:54

superpower and to be a rival to the United States this was the the

20:01

political line say of ybla of the which

20:06

was the premier um uh liberal Democratic um party

20:13

opposing Putin in the last presidential election now the uh the reality is that

20:20

that they have succeeded that and that their economy is now Rising faster than

20:26

than the global economy is uh something like 5% or 5 and a half per. so on the

20:32

Russian side there's been a very big change as for European side I regret to say no I don't believe that Europeans

20:40

other than Mr Orban and Mr fito of Slovakia appreciate the the changes that

20:47

are taking place in Russia which are bringing it uh into a holy new age of of

20:55

sovereignty as Mr Putin says meaning that they are becoming uh

21:01

self-sufficient and developing a um uh State

21:08

financed um capital investment in manufacturing which they could have

21:14

should have done for decades past but never did since they were hoping to have

21:21

some kind of um place in the global um

21:26

uh economic uh and trade structures uh with um more limited

21:36

contribution uh of their best prod production and buying in most everything

21:43

else well that model has gone out of boards and Russia is today um following

21:51

a master master plan for increasing its industrial production that the the um

22:00

Soviet Russia would have been proud of uh but was unable to implement for lack

22:07

of um of talent at the top uh Mr Putin

22:12

has extremely talented very hardworking team that are achieving miracles for

22:18

Russia Today unlike the um the Soviet

22:23

Russia in its last decades did you saw the conditions that

22:29

Mike Pompeo was putting out about the conflict about having a ceasefire in

22:35

Ukraine he was talking about Ukraine being part of the EU and NATO how realistic are these type of Visions

22:42

right now in the United States and how influential he can be on the future

22:48

Trump Administration well critics of of of Donald Trump have pointed to this

22:56

very statement by by Pompeo to suggest I don't believe it's not a new Donald

23:01

Trump that he lets pomp he puts forward Pompeo he did introduce to him at at the

23:07

at the session of the Republican National Convention uh the evening of his of that he accepted nomination at

23:15

Pompeo was there and as oh yes Pompeo was saying these things should don't believe that Trump that Trump has

23:20

changed his politics U but I beg to differ um Pompeo is not close to Trump

23:26

to Trump today pompe is as I understand on the pay of the ukrainians uh he is doing some

23:33

consulting or some some other contractual work with Ukraine and therefore anything that he says must be

23:40

construed as Pompeo as an agent of Kiev and not as Pompeo as a past and future

23:48

colleague of Donald Trump but do you think that Donald Trump

23:55

gonna be influenced by these kind of I'm not talking about specifically about

24:01

Pompeo these people who are more connected with the neocons with these people with deep deep State how Donald

24:09

Trump can decide not to have them in his

24:14

administration look I have identified myself in the past couple of weeks on

24:19

the side of of Donald Trump uh certainly in in the contest against Biden or now

24:25

against Kam haris not because I'm a deep believer in the um uh in the consistency

24:34

or the intellectual depth of Donald Trump uh I have placed great faith in

24:39

his nominee for vice president as keeping him on the straight and narrow

24:45

road towards peace if I had my preference my preference would be the only candidate who was intellectually

24:52

committed to finding a peaceful solution and that is Robert F Kennedy Jr and I

24:58

since I made some contributions to him I'm I have a barrage of emails from him

25:03

every day uh of course asking for still more contributions but reminding me that

25:09

his latest polls showed that in a contest between him and uh and comma

25:14

Harris he or between him and Donald Trump I should say uh he RFK Jr would

25:23

win against Trump handsomely that may be but it's never going to happen I have to be real realistic um third party

25:30

candidates never get very far in American um political life they are no

25:35

more than spoilers as much as I admire the integrity and the consistency of RFK

25:43

on on the question of uh dealing with Ukraine and many other matters I have to

25:48

face the realities of political life and therefore I have placed my bet on Donald Trump but as you say no one and can

25:57

predict with certainty that he will not make the the same disastrous mistakes that he did in his

26:04

first Administration appointing people who were um

26:10

um persuaded that um by the by the

26:16

policies that contradicted directly what Trump announced his intention to do

26:24

whether it was Tillerson or whether it was Pompeo these were terrible appointments

26:29

so I I say that I I I back Trump with my fingers

26:36

crossed polish foreign minister sakori he was talking about creating unbearable

26:42

conditions for Ukrainian in the EU in order to force them to return home do

26:48

you think these type of polit policies on the part of European Union would work for Ukraine is that possible logically

26:58

the I wouldn't take seriously anything that Sikorski says he has said some most

27:03

outrageous things in the past including about the relationship between Poland and the United States which are not to

27:10

be repeated on air um the uh the remarks that he made about um sending uh sending

27:19

ukrainians back uh I think that is simply posturing um and trying to Curry

27:26

favor with anti-russian um citizens in Poland of which there are

27:31

quite a few I don't believe that anyone in Western Europe is going to um visit

27:38

the homes of Ukrainian refugees in their midst and forcibly send send U uh

27:46

conscription age males back to Ukraine to fill the empty ranks of zelinsky's

27:53

army that is unrealistic moreover I think about the

27:58

the very ugly statements that yesterday the day before yesterday sakori made

28:05

about um Victor Orban saying that he should leave the EU and make a security

28:11

PCT with with Moscow this is um very unpolitical for a for I mean very

28:19

undiplomatic for it is political in the sense of currying favor with the anti-russian uh contingence within the

28:28

political Elites of um of Poland but as a me as something coming out of the

28:33

mouth of a of a Minister of Foreign Affairs it is um it is terrible lack of

28:41

professionalism and um so I'd say I take with grain of salt anything that Mr that

28:48

Mr Sikorski says when it comes to Bish Assad's visit

28:55

to Moscow how is the media in Russia talking about this visit and how do you

29:02

find the main objectives of this visit well the the Russian media did not

29:07

say a great deal about it um they they had very little to work on because the

29:13

Russian Uh Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Mr Putin's office said very

29:19

little about it um I have written about it but I acknowledge that what I said is speculation that is to say that um that

29:27

as and Putin were conferring just who does what what what dance steps they're going

29:33

to follow if the situation explodes uh in in the neighborhood of of Syria due

29:41

to an Israeli attack on Hezbollah and I think the from Mr

29:47

Putin's standpoint that visit was important of course Washington knows about it as a message to Washington to

29:55

be very careful uh if before it inter intervenes in the Israeli um Hezbollah

30:02

or Lebanon war that may that may be coming soon uh the United States has has

30:08

big Naval assets as the I think believe it's a a an aircraft carrier with escort

30:13

that are now very close to Israel with the intent to intimidate um Lebanon and

30:20

to give some Assurance to to Israel that the United States would back them if they attack uh the of course that's not

30:28

Mr blinkin is calling it he's saying that they're there to um uh to ensure

30:33

that this does not escalate but the reality of the presence says says otherwise the Russians are there the

30:40

Russians have a naval base in Syria it's mostly for re repair and and uh

30:48

refitting and supplying Russian uh Fleet in the

30:54

Mediterranean they also have an Airbase uh and in in in Syria so um it was a

31:01

reminder to Washington that um Russia is prepared to uh to intervene if necessary

31:09

is also a reminder to Israel that um that they their attacks their jet

31:17

attacks on sites in in Syria particularly repeated attacks near

31:24

Aleppo uh which were directed according to to the Israelis against arms caches

31:31

of Hezbollah in Syrian territory or against um

31:36

uh Goods transiting Syria on their way to Lebanon and Hezbollah um that this

31:44

has been tolerated Russia has not has never in the past given air defense to

31:50

Syria but it certainly is capable of doing so and if it were it would change entirely the calculations of the Israeli

31:57

army or if not the calculations the um uh the

32:04

possibilities of uh of dealing with

32:09

Hezbollah uh for the Israeli AR uh Army and Air Force so it was a reminder that

32:16

that Russia is there and Russia is interested I think it's also um a um a

32:23

signal to Iran that of the same nature because the first country that will have

32:30

to come to the aid of Lebanon if there is an attack on Hezbollah is Iran and it

32:35

would give it give them considerable Comfort to know that the Russians May well be at their

32:42

side and how did you find the Na's visit

32:47

to the US Congress and the way that he was changing the Ric from Hezbollah to

32:54

Iran let's go after Iran let's fight Iran is he trying to to to go to war

33:00

with Iran or he's trying to make a war between the United States and

33:06

Iran I think it's a combination of that the keia has always been after Iran this

33:12

goes back uh more than a decade um Iran has been the target of all of his

33:19

addresses on the international Arena Iran was always a week or two away from from a nuclear weapon and this was the

33:27

red flag he was holding out in front of the Americans uh to um to encourage

33:33

their support for any attack that Israel would make on Iran Israel by itself um

33:41

is um does not have the force to deal

33:46

with Iran without American Support so um

33:52

he is preparing Congress and he apparently got their their acquiescence

33:57

uh um in proceeding with a war on Hezbollah with a very high possibility

34:04

if not probability that that will progress to a war on Iran um however if

34:10

he has this IOU or this promisory note in his pocket it is a promisory note of

34:17

doubtful value because there is Big um debate in the states whether or not they

34:24

should the states should get engaged in a war with Iran they um in Washington

34:29

there are some people who understand very well that the cap the military capabilities of Iran are much

34:35

greater than Netanyahu would suggest the ability of Iran for example to devastate

34:43

the many American military installations in the uh in the Middle East with

34:49

missile attacks um is something that must give Washington Mr Biden's team

34:55

pause um and limit their enthusiasm for supporting Netanyahu in an attack on

35:04

Iran but when it comes to Hezbollah we we know that recently before this new

35:11

tensions coming up the Biden Administration said to Neto if you want

35:17

to fight Hezbollah you're going to be alone and we're not going to be there and right now do you think that they're

35:22

changing their mind I think so I think there is a

35:27

debate which we don't see on the television screens but there is a debate in in Congress over how far America can

35:35

or should go and as I said there are cooler heads among military who understand that that may be a step too

35:42

far for United States to get embroiled in a in a war with Iran for the sake of

35:50

satisfying Mr netanyahu's Ambitions of longstanding to have such

35:56

support the part of this policy in the Middle East is what China is doing and

36:02

what what you just what you've just mentioned about bash Al Assad and maybe

36:08

erdogan talking to each other as Russia wanted to do that and how do you see the

36:14

changes that are happening in terms of what Russia and China are doing right

36:21

now well the the two are not allies in a

36:26

military sense because China has an enshrined policy of

36:33

not entering into military block and of maintaining its uh freedom to um to

36:40

engage or not to engage uh in other people's Wars the um Chinese haven't

36:48

been in a military Conflict for more than 40 years and that's not an accident that was a policy choice so um the they

36:56

will join the Russians in active combat only if it is utterly necessary to avoid

37:03

Russian defeat or embarrassment or humiliation that would reflect on themselves because Russia is a very

37:11

important uh support to China logistically Mater uh in raw materials

37:18

and diplomatically so the the the Chinese could not allow Russia to be humiliated

37:26

in a way that might lead to political

37:31

um difficulties political um conflict

37:37

within Russia they want a stable Russia at their side the the fact that the

37:44

Chinese uh send send sent Naval vessels halfway across the world to participate

37:51

in what a ceremonial event this Navy day in in Russia is an additional point to

37:57

what we saw a couple of weeks ago when when it was announced that um Chinese

38:04

forces are present uh at the at the Polish and Ukrainian borders on the

38:09

Belarus side in what are we called anti-terrorist um joint exercises well

38:16

the anti-terrorist it's not it's not a misnomer what they had in mind is the kind of attacks that took place in GG

38:23

province of Russia Federation when Ukrainian sent um various groups

38:30

including some some um anti- Kremlin Russians uh to attack in a

38:38

terrorist manner residential communities in belg uh there has been discussion

38:45

that the that the ukrainians Andor um the the poles have had similar

38:53

ideas with respect to bellarus as we know um Poland together with lania has

38:59

been a very strong supporter of the anti- lukashenko uh C uh so socalled president

39:10

of of of belus uh who is now in Exile

39:16

and um so then then add to this the the Chinese Russian joint Patrol in the

39:24

Bearing Sea close to Alaska last week as

39:29

another demonstration that when it comes to when push comes to shove if necessary

39:36

China will stand by Russia with milit as a military partner uh confronting uh any

39:45

part of the West as necessary it is a it is a push back to M Yen stoltenberg and

39:53

Washington's idea of a of an Asian NATO and the Russian and the Russians and

39:59

Chinese are saying uh that that the Eurasian continent has two

40:05

sides and U if you want to concentrate on the Eastern side we Chinese and

40:11

Russians can jointly concentrate on the western side so think twice about your

40:18

your idea of an Asian NATO buil built an Aus yeah just to wrap up this session we

40:27

thought that macron is not going to send French mercenaries to Ukraine but we've

40:33

learned that they did that and how how we can put the picture of these changes

40:38

that are happening in France in terms of lepan how they can change the policy

40:45

when it comes to sending mercenaries to Ukraine and why they couldn't do that so

40:51

far well in in the person of of Emanuel macron we have a very

40:57

inconsistent very superficial politician who who I mean if we want to

41:03

say that that Donald Trump uh was transactional and changed his policies

41:10

uh very often or too often one can say certainly the same thing about about

41:15

macron uh who is a a different personality from from Trump but nonetheless shares this he will do

41:22

anything to get the microphone he will do anything to present himself as

41:27

leading Europe and the West uh either into an agreement with Russia or into a

41:34

war with Russia uh which it will be depends on on the moment uh and and is

41:39

not a consistent policy line of the man I think we the what the Russians have

41:45

are now saying about about macron Bear's mention they're calling him the Blue

41:51

Rooster they have no uh hesitation to call him out as a homosexual they have

41:58

no uh and they have used the footage the film footage from the obscene uh opening

42:05

ceremony um of the Olympics to demonstrate their point about the corruption degradation and uh uh and

42:14

likely suicide of France as leading leading Western Europe to its Doom so um

42:22

Mr marron's put sending some some mercenaries to to to help the ukrainians

42:30

it's just it's a token these are not massive quantities of men and certainly

42:35

not normal um French soldiers um but his ability to

42:43

flip-flop uh according to what he thinks will be serve his purposes his

42:49

opportunism in that respect uh cannot be underestimated

42:56

[Music]

43:03

L be I

43:09

we to to to to

43:14

like take take it letain

43:21

see I Ro Miss no Ro

43:29

to every

43:35

make I be to yeah I speak

43:43

go [Music] St

43:48

what listen

43:54

list we behind to Li

44:01

for take your F

44:06

we we we we we take we make

44:19

we we [Music]

44:30

[Music]

44:38

L hi be f i

44:45

we to to to

44:50

power take take it take let pain we see

44:58

I Ro sing we sing Miss

45:03

no no to every

45:11

make I told yeah I

45:19

speak the St

45:24

what listen listen

45:30

simple W behind toen liar

45:37

for take your fin all s

45:43

we we we

45:50

take we might make

45:55

Makey we t [Music]

English (auto-generated)

AllFrom Lan HandmadePolitics newsRelated













For youRecently uploadedWatched